Pray tell me, how do you arrive at that < /sarc > conclusion?
You argue that "our side" is lying on a Los Angeles Times story titled: News Analysis: Trump seeks to reclaim spotlight with old playbook of lying, talking smack to media.
It doesn't take a degree in logic to see you are on the LAT side of the argument. LAT is on the side of Kamala Harris
Thus, if A=B and B=C, then A=C.