Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Rinnwald
Are you led to believe that police actively pursue misdemeanor cases, shill?

For whom/what do you accuse me of "shilling"? Save the name calling for visits to DU.

Do you think getting a misdemeanor charge for stealing $949 is fair?

No, it's wrong and stupid. And police who will not investigate "minor" crimes should pay a price for the failure. The point is that our side has stated that there are NO CONSEQUENCES for thefts under $950. Which gives ammunition to the other side to "prove" us liars.

Just the facts, please. Thefts under $950 are treated as misdemeanors, when they should be considered felonies.

47 posted on 08/19/2024 9:24:54 AM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Finish the damned WALL! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: JimRed
The point is that our side has stated that there are NO CONSEQUENCES for thefts under $950.

There are effectively no consequences for thefts under $950.

You're asking for a higher level of accuracy from soundbites than politics provides. Soundbites on our side that are hard hitting and expose the leniency of the other side.

Complaining about the accuracy effectively makes you a Detail Troll. See how I didn't actually call you a Detail Troll?

49 posted on 08/19/2024 9:54:52 AM PDT by Rinnwald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson