Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tench_Coxe

I read this article and I could see anywhere what the actual case is about. Anyone know?


5 posted on 08/13/2024 12:57:41 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: spacejunkie2001

In June, Florida judges ruled Zachary Young and his company Nemex Enterprises Inc. offered enough evidence to move forward in a defamation suit against CNN. Young alleged that the network smeared his security consulting company by implying it illegally profited when helping people flee Afghanistan, using the terms “black market,” “exploit” and “exorbitant” to paint him as a bad actor preying upon desperate people.


6 posted on 08/13/2024 1:07:35 PM PDT by Valpal1 (Not even the police are safe from the police!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: spacejunkie2001

Zachary Young’s company provided evacuation services to people fleeing Afghanistan when they were not evacuated by the US. CNN basically smeared him and his company.

Young sued CNN for defamation per se, defamation by implication, and trade libel, arguing CNN destroyed his reputation and business by branding him an illegal profiteer who exploited desperate Afghans. Specifically, Young alleged CNN repeatedly accused him of operating in a “black market” and mischaracterized his work as exploitative because he charged “exorbitant” fees Afghan citizens could not pay. Young claimed he was particularly harmed because he was the only private evacuator profiled in the reporting.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/fl-district-court-of-appeal/116259204.html


7 posted on 08/13/2024 1:13:28 PM PDT by clashfan (><> ><> ><> ><> )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson