To: absalom01
"Not only did he claim he should be given qualified immunity, but that Soukaneh, in effect, forfeited his Fourth Amendment rights barring unreasonable search and seizure because he chose to exercise his right to carry a firearm."
I imagine even the 2nd circuit could not justify the latter part of that statement. Holy cow....
3 posted on
08/13/2024 10:23:12 AM PDT by
Tench_Coxe
(The woke were surprised by the reaction to the Bud Light fiasco. May there be many more surprises)
To: Tench_Coxe
The denial of qualified immunity is the real breakthrough in this case & may have larger implications in the future.
5 posted on
08/13/2024 10:28:49 AM PDT by
T-Bird45
(It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't. )
To: Tench_Coxe
Yeah, that’s twisted an evil reasoning to say that exercising a right nullifies another right in that fashion.
8 posted on
08/13/2024 11:45:38 AM PDT by
Darksheare
(Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same. )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson