Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GenXPolymath

I agree. You should be the energy czar.


23 posted on 08/12/2024 10:11:17 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: MtnClimber

A plant that sized would cost 30.2 billion of the Koreans built it. Over 80 years that’s 31 million per month capex. A plant that sized makes 5.1 million per day in power sales selling at 2 cents per kWh half the current wholesale rate or 10.2 million per day at the current wholesale rate. Three days per month would cover the capex four if you finance it via the state at 5% bond rate. Of course O&M and fuel need to be added in. For a CANDU fuel is 3 tenths of a cent per kWh. O&M varies but is in the 1 cent range. The CANDU reactor is the cheapest O&M and fuel cost in the industry no one beats them and they cannot melt down with a giant water tank around the core that already is at the lowest level in the structure it can not leak away it pools in the same location. Passive boiling and condensation on the containment dome puts the water back to the sink without operator action. That’s assuming the triple back up other cooling systems failed beforehand. The only reason the USA uses PWR reactors is the enrichment plants were subsidized by us payers for the dod nuclear weapons program that’s it. Heavy water reactors are superior in every way to a PWR.


25 posted on 08/12/2024 10:34:20 AM PDT by GenXPolymath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson