“turbocancer? vax? smoker?”
I have no theory, but I live in the Bay Area, and I will note that among women of her age (50s), education (Harvard) and socioeconomic status (super-rich), tobacco use is very, very low. In other words, it’d be pretty unusual for someone like her to be a cigarette smoker. Not impossible, but statistically unlikely. Cannabis smoker would be more likely.
I don’t know how much cannabis is linked to lung cancer but it sure ain’t healthy for them I would guess.
Statistically (up until the Fake Vax anyway) about 90% of lung cancer victims are smokers. A fair number of the other 10% have had exposure to something. A small number number of non smokers just lost the genetic lottery for cancer resistance.
If she was never a smoker it is a reasonable question to ask if she had the Jab, or multiple Jabs because of the increases of various cancer rates in traditionally low risk groups since the Jab was foisted on us.
No smoking, no Jab? Just bad genetic luck.
As a doctor said to me (prior to the mRNA Jab - which may well be a new wild card on this subject), Not all smokers will get lung cancer, but most people who do get lung cancer are smokers.