Already destroyed by the Kenyan Obama
“Already destroyed by the Kenyan Obama.”
—————-
So, under your “logic“ if somebody gets away with robbing a bank, we can’t charge the next person who robs the bank and gets caught with a crime, simply because the first guy got away with it. That is logically and legally absurd.
This discussion needs to be had right now, before the election, and preferably in a case before the United States Supreme Court. You can bet your bottom dollar that we are going to have more and more people with divided loyalties being put forth as candidates for President as time goes on. This is unacceptable. The intent behind the “natural born citizen” requirement in the Constitution is that the President of the United States not have any possibility of divided loyalties, and this was assumed (as the article mentioned) to be the case only with people who were both born as citizens, and who were ALSO born to two parents who were citizens at the time of their birth. Otherwise, there is no point to the words “natural born “ in the eligibility section of Article 2. From a legal standpoint, it has long since been part of our law that no words in the Constitution are there for no reason. They all have meaning, and we have never had a ruling on this particular issue during our entire history. We desperately need to have such a ruling, and better with the present Originalist-oriented composition of the Court than if the Democrats retain the presidency And we get a bunch of “Living Constitution” advocates.
NOT REALLY
DEAN NEVER VETTED OBAMA
PELOSI SIGNED A “CERTIFICATION” when rumors started that she had left out the phrase “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN”
Both events were FRAUD.
THEN-—THE “BIRTH CERTIFICATE” OBAMA FINALLY PRODUCED:
The name of the hospital on that ‘certificate’ is the name of a hospital created when 2 other hospitals MERGED-—5-6 years AFTER BARRY was born.
The FORGERS didn’t do much research