Posted on 08/05/2024 10:39:18 PM PDT by kawhill
Back then the average life expectancy was 37-38 years. So really 35 was closer to our 70-75.
‘k, so let’s have a 150 IQ twenty two year old President
Right?
(the founders didn’t know what the ( ) they were talking about Right?)
I call bs.
How old was Ben Franklin, et.al?
take away the infant/early childhood mortality no way 37-38 years
Its an average. An average. It doesn’t mean there aren’t some people who are going to live long lives.
The average of those times had more infant and childhood deaths. Further, the more elite/higher you were in society, the more likely you’d live longer. Better food, better care, better shelter, less dangerous work.
No Schiff Sherlock, that’s the point.
Acting like most people didn’t live to 40 or more years old as your comment suggests is stupid.
I’m not stating that. The only question I had in starting the thread to begin with was why the age of 35? Honestly, fellow human being, if I analyze the data of the accomplishments of the people who have been in command of this Nation for the last 3.5+ years and how those accomplishments have been of benefit to you and I and our neighbors and friends and families and communities and I ponder four years of Kamala in charge, I might be inclined to cast a vote for a 22 year with an IQ of 150. If that human being had studied concepts of a Constitutional Republic, a free market economy, rights enumerated to me by my Creator, capitalism, a whole bunch of stuff. I thoroughly enjoy a civil discourse with human beings like you, it’s the very reason I hang out here for a few minutes of my day. Best regards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.