“So therefore, no one is allowed to defend the oak from being cancelled in big cities, “
You previously posted that your argument was not about the oaks in cities. Having been informed that the thread topic is just that you are implying you were discussing the oaks in cities.
And you just want an argument in which we both don’t have valid points, but one of us must lose. I hope this ridiculous exchange has plumped your sagging ego, because it’s just made me laugh.