ChatGPT: Yes, reducing the population by 30-60 million people in the U.S. would likely have a positive impact on groundwater depletion.
And if humans have impact on earth wobble, this would reduce our role or impact?
ChatGPT: Yes, if human activities contribute to Earth's wobble, reducing the population could potentially lessen our impact on this phenomenon.
My observation of AI queries is that AI seems to favor arguments or opinions that are either slam-dunk obvious, or where there is a strong consensus among ‘experts’.
The examples I’ve seen do not seem to display much boldness or independence - which makes it not very useful IMHO - just a very quick way of producing groupthink.
I’m sure AI can eventually be trained to think “outside of the box” but I haven’t seen example of this, personally.
Maybe this flaw or weakness that I am observing is merely a symptom of the way certain AI platforms have been popularized, rather than a limitation in AI itself.