[WildHighlander57]

Steve Van Doorn wrote:

“
Yes I’m fairly sure that is how it would go. Though when he was witnessing the shooter aiming his weapon at Trump. He doesn’t need approval. That is a legal defensive action for any citizen. Approval is needed when you have a highly suspicious target.

30 minutes before the attack An officer at the rally took a photo of Thomas Matthew Crooks at 5:45 p.m. and reported him as a suspicious person
https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/1812962538000089327
“

In that x post, the right earlobe in pic on left doesn’t have a gage hole in it.

Earlobe of dead guy on roof -does- have a gage hole in it:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4251335/posts?page=184#184

Two different guys.

Need to find mugshot of Yearick showing the right ear.

[Steve Van Doorn]

Yes. not the same guy. The ears are questionable for me.
As the lobs on the dead guy are next to none. It's as though the lobs been cut off or something. Also has a large cut in the upper part of the dead guys ear again as thought the ear was cut.
I would suggest this guy was abused or self mutilation.
I'm going by the scars in both eye brows on the guy on the left. The guy on the right has no scars in the eye brows.

Another thing VERY odd. The guy on the right was shot in the mouth with a low velocity weapon. The bullet likely a pistol went between the front teeth and through the nasal passage. If it was a high velocity weapon his front teeth would be knocked out completely. Low velocity would force the teeth back as you can see in the pic.

you know what is stranger? This is how the body in the Las Vegas shooting looked. he was shot in the mouth. Same MO.
Don't ask me how. Though something is very strange.