https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/lady-macbiden
“Lady MacBiden”
Trump Assassination Attempt: Does Dr Jill Biden Need to be Questioned?
Dr Naomi Wolf
I am careful about my words. I don’t throw around accusations, and, for the legal record, I am not here making an accusation. This essay is deliberately written so as to not be an act of defamation or of libel.
Here is my immediate response on Saturday July 13, to the assassination attempt. As I warned you all in my recent essay “What Time It is”, about the incarceration of Stephen K Bannon, the attempt on President Trump’s life on Saturday July 13 was sadly predictable, as we are in the period, foreseeable per the historical record in a declining democracy, of the “physical mopping-up of the opposition.”
Subsequent to the assassination attempt against President Trump last Saturday in Butler, PA, I need to talk about Dr Jill Biden and her office.
Wow wow wow! Powerful article. Near the end she mentions a guard pointing his rifle at the van whisking Trump away. First I have about that!
But the reference and X-twitter link she made about someone in uniform pointing a rifle at Pres. Trump's van as he entered it...is explained by one of the replies in that X thread (I'll put it below, man with rifle circled in red, pointing rifle, a black object attached to the top of his helmet).
Namely, a long zoom camera lens can make a farther away object (the uniformed person with a rifle) appear to be close to what is in the foreground of the video (Pres. Trump's van) and the picture below shows that the man pointing the rifle is actually far away from Pres. Trump's van. Very clear, no doubt about it.
Ok. Here you go dude. Look at it. He wasn't pointing his weapon anywhere near the car. Angles and zoom can be deceiving. I guessed other side of the vehicle. He was even pointing his weapon further away. Video linked... https://t.co/VsSv3tm2u5 pic.twitter.com/Y0AtEvEg8X— Kevin (@knewenigma) July 17, 2024
___
___
Naomi Wolf's article "Lady MacBiden", link to the misleading video is in the latter part of article...
From your excellent article:
Did FLOTUS’ event, and Harris’, require dozens of top Secret Service operatives, leaving Pres Trump exposed? Did these two events require all of the tall Secret Service operatives, or all of the Secret Service operatives that were actually well-trained in use of their weapons?
How did the Secret Service operatives who were with First Lady Jill Biden, react, when it was clear that a gunman had fired at and injured a President less than an hour away? Was FLOTUS whisked out of her casino event, as is standard when there is a heightened security context in the country? Or did she calmly finish her event?
Where did she go after that?
Did Secret Service get her to a more secure location than the one that was initially planned for her? That heightened response would have been standard under normal circumstances. At that point it would not have been known if the attack was on Pres. Trump alone or perhaps an attack by a foreign enemy, on multiple US “principals”.
What communications did FLOTUS’ office have with the White House Chief of Staff, with the Secret Service, with the campaign? It would be normal for there to be coordination related to security.
.......
Dig, FReeQs!
I did read a media report that SS dispatched to Jillith some agents who had been actually assigned to the Trump rally.
It was at the early time without official attribution to the source, thus not confirmed.
PS:
This is a sickening compilation of on-going threat-risk to Trump that needs to go straight to Comer’s Congressional Investigative Committee, on the FBI, SS and Q MIL security measures.
Trump deserves a lot more security assurance going forward from these three institutions, after the total Fail that was provided by them on Saturday the 13th.