Nuke paywall here:
Url to enter in “saved from” is:
https://www.economist.com/leaders/2024/07/04/why-biden-must-withdraw
Weak opponent?! Trump! There’s probably only a handful of people in Trump’s class.
The author, Ricardo Rey, after reading just a little bit of the article, is a real partisan doofus.
Age and Disability Discrimination
First, the author of the piece made sure that he thought Trump was as bad or worse than Biden.
Second, he perpetuates the lie that Biden was a “decent” man.
Third, after spending paragraphs describing how a superpower cannot run on autopilot, he does NOT state that Biden should resign, but should simply not run again.
Fourth, he gives no replacement name. You cannot replace something with nothing, and you also cannot replace nothing with nothing.
Here’s the part that is unstated: If Biden resigns, Kamala Harris gets the spot. If she is the sitting President, she gets the campaign spot. She is not an interim NFL head coach.
The author also ignores the fact that replacing the top spot without Kamala will fracture the party, and kill the whole ticket, not just the top spot. A lot of Democrats who can live through a Trump win cannot survive a party fracture.
“Economist” Republicans are like National Review Republicans, only even MORE globalist. They are an unwanted breed.
The takeaway from the Biden debate was it is OK to rape anyone because abortion can correct that little mistake.
Physical ailments are a part of getting old. But Biden has always been a slimy vengeful angry POS and disgusting child predator.
Headline— Why Biden Must withdraw
During the antiwar protests in 1967 some had placards saying
LBJ
Withdraw Like
Your Old Man
Should Have
every one of these “biden must withdraw” articles also just HAVE to include the lengthy obligatory diatribe about how EVIIIIIIIIIL! Donald Trump is ...
The subject of the article was Biden’s health and mental status. However, about half the article was a hit piece on Republicans and Trump. Back in the 70s I was a great fan of The Economist. It was once real journalism that was not agenda driven. It sadly has become leftist and is no longer a great publication.
“His inability to land an argument against a weak opponent“
Are ANY of these people auditing REALITY? They believe whatever they need or want to believe. Donald Trump has deflected their unprecedented and often illegal attacks and been otherwise kicking their asses in most ways that can be measured. Why can’t they admit that they’re up against a formidable foe?