[snip] A day before Thursday's presidential debate, the New York Times ran a front-page story in its print edition railing against the posting of unflattering videos of Joe Biden. Among the president's many "adversaries," observed the Times, was the "distorted, online version of himself, a product of often misleading videos that play into and reinforce voters' longstanding concerns about his age and abilities."
Such voter concerns were misguided, according to the Times and its sources. Former Illinois representative [and still RINO liar and horse's ass] Adam Kinzinger told the paper: "If you see those [videos] and that's all you see, you're going to walk away thinking there's something wrong, like something's going on." [/snip]
The New York Times is clueless about how they're manipulated. Here's a hint: years ago white liberal 'elties' figured out it was a waste of time to spend their energy, time and money trying to convince millions of citizens when they could focus 90% of their effort on less than a hundred people in the press. It's where the concept of 'influencers' came from... Elites let press monkeys carry their messages. Folks at the New York Times - the last to know.