To: Dr. Franklin
That’s interesting and def fits him.
I have either never heard before or forgot but that page says he believed trees and other inanimate objects should have standing.
16 posted on
07/02/2024 5:17:22 PM PDT by
Freest Republican
(There is no tyranny that cannot be justified by imbeciles)
To: Freest Republican
That’s interesting and def fits him. I have either never heard before or forgot but that page says he believed trees and other inanimate objects should have standing.
It's been a few years since I remember reading the case in the law library. It may have been Hicks v. District of Columbia, 383 U.S. 252 (1966) which wasn't a disorderly conduct statute, but vagrancy. Frankly, I am tired of hearing that people don't have standing to object to rigged elections in court.
19 posted on
07/02/2024 9:02:34 PM PDT by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it." )
To: Freest Republican
That’s interesting and def fits him.
Just imagine what the modern leftist femi-nazis would think of his last two wives: a 23 year old college student, and a 22 year old waitress. It was controversial at the time, but unlike guys like Clinton, Douglas actually married these ladies.
20 posted on
07/03/2024 7:44:41 AM PDT by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it." )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson