Be content with what you have;
rejoice in the way things are.
When you realize there is nothing lacking,
the whole world belongs to you.
Lao Tzu
https://expose-news.com/2024/07/02/pfizer-purchased-companies-that-produce/
Pfizer purchased companies that produce drugs to treat the same conditions caused by covid vaccines
In 2017 a former vice president of Pfizer blew the whistle and said that pharmaceutical companies intentionally design vaccines to keep the public in a state of illness to profit from the treatments of vaccine-induced illnesses.
Pfizer’s acquisitions of other pharmaceutical companies since the rollout of its covid vaccine seem to indicate this is indeed the case.
In 2021, Pfizer’s acquisition of Arena Pharmaceuticals raised eyebrows. The purchase price seemed disproportionate to the market size of the drug they acquired – a drug that is a potential therapy for all kinds of immuno-inflammatory diseases, including inflammation of the heart. As we know, myocarditis began to skyrocket after the rollout of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines.
In 2023, Pfizer purchased Seagen Pharmaceuticals, known for its cancer drugs. Was this because of the connection between the mRNA injections and “turbo cancers”?
In 2022, Pfizer purchased Global Blood Therapeutics for its drug to treat sickle cell disease, again for an amount that seemed disproportionate to the profit the company could make off the drug considering how many people have the disease. Does Pfizer know something we don’t? Will we see a blood cell disease epidemic as well?
https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/justice-department-looks-ways-continue-january-6-cases-after-supreme
Justice Department looks for ways to continue January 6 cases after Supreme Court ruling
The Supreme Court made it harder to charge defendants with obstruction in January 6 cases. But charges can still be brought if prosecutors can prove that rioters were intentionally trying to stop the arrival of certificates used to certify electoral votes during the riot.
Federal prosecutors on Monday have requested stays on pending January 6 court cases in order to evaluate a recent Supreme Court ruling that limited their prosecutions of the rioters.
[Big deal. The only “rioters” were FBLiar Fedbois]
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/south-dakotas-foreign-land-ownership-law-one-several-now-effect
The bill also prohibits any of the countries from leasing agricultural land unless it is for research and is no more than 320 acres or is for the contract feeding of livestock under certain circumstances.
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/platforms-over-people-scotus-decisions-make-social-media-censorship-easier
Platforms over people? SCOTUS decisions make social media censorship easier than protecting speech
Justice Alito’s concurrence reads more like dissent, says Kagan’s opinion “unreflectively assumes” that platforms who “use secret algorithms to review and moderate an almost unimaginable quantity of data” are same as “newspaper editors who marked up typescripts in blue pencil 50 years ago.”
Whose First Amendment rights are more important, those of individuals or corporations?
A pair of Supreme Court rulings days apart raised legal-standing hurdles for individuals to sue public officials for pressuring online platforms to censor their viewpoints and First Amendment hurdles for governments to protect viewpoints against platform censorship.
While both cases are heading back to lower courts for further development, the rulings may give Americans the impression they have little recourse against infringements of their digital speech, in the courts or at the ballot box, with four months before the presidential election.
BAD BAD BAD NOT. Punished for telling the TRUTH!
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/giuliani-disbarred-new-york
Giuliani disbarred in New York after court finds he repeatedly lied about 2020 election results
The decision was handed down by a New York appeals court in Manhattan
https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/new-fbi-whistleblower-supports-claims-political-bias-security-clearance
Bombshell: FBI supervisor alleges bureau improperly pulling conservative agents’ security clearances
New whistleblower complaint follows a Just the News report in June that revealed the FBI’s shocking litmus test for one agency employee’s security review.
An FBI supervisor is blowing the whistle on his own organization, alleging to the Justice Department’s chief watchdog and Congress that the bureau has been improperly suspending or revoking the security clearances of agents it believes hold conservative political views.
The new whistleblower’s allegations surfaced Tuesday in correspondence obtained by “Just the News” that was sent to the House and Senate Judiciary committees and DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, dramatically claiming that as a supervisory special agent he witnessed efforts by senior FBI brass to target employees who supported Donald Trump or opposed COVID-19 vaccines.