My comment is rather clear, but I’ll elaborate, just for you, because I am a geek at heart and this did more than ‘smh’ (it angered me):
They ‘reconstructed’ a view of an event witnessed by human eyes from the perspective of a film compromised by exposure characteristics which blotted out the starfield clearly visible to the astronauts.
The reconstruction ought to have been from human eyes.
It was a grossly pathetic result. Lazy, in fact.
I can see where you’re coming from but can’t see it as something to get upset about. They state that their goal was to reconstruct the event as it would have looked were it recorded with a modern movie camera, not as how it would have looked to the astronauts.