Posted on 06/30/2024 5:30:22 AM PDT by MtnClimber
This is an excellent ruling for liberty, but the judiciary still claims too much power here, as they say they, not Congress, will determine the meaning of the laws Congress passes.
Overturning Chevron is not sufficient in itself, but an extremely necessary first step.
Why the Supreme Court’s decision overruling Chevron and limiting federal agencies is so significant
6/29/2024, 7:57:17 AM · by GonzoII · 39 replies
CBS ^ | June 28, 2024 / 3:31 PM CDT | Melissa Quinn
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4247605/posts
How U.S. responses to public health emergencies could be hamstrung by the Supreme Court
6/29/2024, 4:21:50 AM · by ProgressingAmerica · 22 replies
StatNews ^ | June 28, 2024 | John Wilkerson
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4247584/posts
When OHSA unilaterally mandated that tens of millions of private sector workers take the COVID shot or wear masks, appellate courts cited the Chevron doctrine for allowing it People don’t understand how important it is that Chevron deference is dead
6/29/2024, 1:08:00 AM · by george76 · 70 replies
X twitter ^ | Jun 28, 2024 | Gregg Re
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4247448/posts
Supreme Court Overturns Ruling Federal Agencies Relied On to Create Regulatory Gun Control
6/28/2024, 5:55:37 PM · by Tench_Coxe · 12 replies
Breitbart ^
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4247448/posts
SHOCKER: SCOTUS Delivers a Kill Shot to Big Government in the Chevron deference case
6/28/2024, 4:58:26 PM · by SeekAndFind · 43 replies
PJ Media ^ | 06/28/2024 | Paula Bolyard
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4247425/posts
Supreme Court overturns Chevron decision, curtailing federal agencies’ power in major shift
6/28/2024, 2:32:29 PM · by Tench_Coxe · 83 replies
CBS ^
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4247361/posts
“My sheriff will. How about yours?”
Actually, no. Your sheriff will only be enforcing the ruling he likes, not the ones handed out that he (or you) don’t like.
The Supreme Court is a FEDERAL court, thus it should have the power to enforce its rulings nationwide, not let each podunk sheriff do as they like. If you want that, then you don’t have a country, what you have is thousands of counties doing as they like (which is not necessarily bad).
Right now the only branch of government with countrywide enforcement power is the executive branch through the department of In-Justice.
We don’t have a federal executive branch enforcing law.
It will fall to the states to challenge unconstitutional diktats. Here’s one example:
26 Republican attorneys general sue to block Biden rule requiring background checks at gun shows
https://apnews.com/article/biden-gun-show-background-checks-lawsuit-25b1d7eb7711939e73bee89838f4c318
The illegal diktat is suspended until it’s reviewed by the judiciary. At the governor’s direction, both sheriffs and the state police can ensure that the diktat is not implemented.
There’s nothing about a “podunk” sheriff doing whatever. I find your attitude toward sheriffs troubling.
The Bright decision is going to play out in ways that nobody can predict.
“We don’t have a federal executive branch enforcing law.”
Of course we do. It’s the DOJ. The problem is that it’s under the control of the executive, which means often the president and his administrators get a free ride, or they sic it after their political enemies, like Biden is doing with Trump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.