Does the chevron decision rip the wings off the FDA? I rather think it does. Also NIAD and CDC. Now real physicians can practice medicine finally. Without Fauci who neither has a license nor has been at bedside ever who dictates crap we must work around.
“Does the chevron decision rip the wings off the FDA? I rather think it does. “
It could if a petitioner wants to challenge whether the laws behind the FDA are ambiguous in some way that the FDA itself has interpreted to its liking. That challenge would be different than one that only disputed the FDA’s opinion of the facts behind a ruling of theirs, which the current SCOTUS decision allows to remain controlled by the agency. They now get to interpret facts and expert opinion as they choose, but only if at the same time they have NOT devised their own interpretation of the law(s) behind their regulation. SCOTUS now says interpetation of legal ambiguity is for the courts, not the agencies.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled FDA is a front organisation: There are no technicians in the buildings, no equipment and no sample testing occurs, gas_dr wrote: Does the chevron decision rip the wings off the FDA? I rather think it does. Also NIAD and CDC. Now real physicians can practice medicine finally. Without Fauci who neither has a license nor has been at bedside ever who dictates crap we must work around.
Throughout Covid and the Covid 'vaccine' you pushed the NIAD/CDC party line. You said Ivermectin didn't work. You said everyone in 'your' ICU was unvaccinated (PS: You're not a real doctor).
All your posts supporting the CDC's lies! I recall you saying a person can get the vax, or 'take their chances' with Covid. As if there's no risk in getting the experimental vaccine, even after people started waving the red flag in alarm.
You don't 'work around' CDC dictates. But you promote them until they are exposed and fail. Then you take the 'high ground.' Disgusting.