Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson shows her independence in January 6 ruling
WaPo ^ | June 28, 2024 | Jason Willick

Posted on 06/29/2024 8:14:27 AM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: MinorityRepublican

Which makes my assertion simply speculation rather than fact.


41 posted on 06/29/2024 4:59:56 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

It’s possible.


42 posted on 06/29/2024 5:03:17 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: A strike

Murthy


43 posted on 06/29/2024 5:06:56 PM PDT by A strike (no tyranny that cannot be justified by 'climate change')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: A strike

Nope. I look at a number of opinions she was signed onto or authored.

Which seems to be a rarity for posters.


44 posted on 06/29/2024 6:28:54 PM PDT by Fury (I )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege; All
Everyone here will disagree, but I thought Jackson's answer to, "Can you provide a definition for the word 'woman'?" was not a bad answer.
BLACKBURN: "Can you provide a definition for the word 'woman'?"

JACKSON: “Can I provide a definition? No. I can’t.”

BLACKBURN: "You can't?"

JACKSON: "Not in this context. I'm not a biologist."

I took that answer to mean biology determines whether a person is a man or a woman.

I get that Republicans just wanted a gotcha, but there are some rare conditions where outward appearance and chromosomes don't seem to match.

45 posted on 06/29/2024 8:51:49 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fury

You asked : “Cite SPECIFICALLY in an opinion she signed on to ...”
which was answered and which your response has nothing whatsoever to do with.


46 posted on 06/29/2024 9:28:37 PM PDT by A strike (no tyranny that cannot be justified by 'climate change')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: A strike

My response was referring to the ignorant comment of:

“Still lovin’ on another “conservative” useless idjit?”

I look at her totality of USSC work.


47 posted on 06/30/2024 4:37:55 AM PDT by Fury (I )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson