[chickenlips]

Everyone needs to keep this in mind that this doesn’t automatically invalidate a bunch of laws. They will need to be challenged again in court.

From Redstate:
https://redstate.com/joesquire/2024/06/28/prewrite-scotus-and-chevron-deference-n2175959

“Roberts added that this decision does “not call into question prior cases that relied on the Chevron framework. The holdings of those cases that specific agency actions are lawful—including the Clean Air Act holding of Chevron itself—are still subject to statutory stare decisis despite our change in interpretive methodology.””

[zeugma]

“Roberts added that this decision does “not call into question prior cases that relied on the Chevron framework. The holdings of those cases that specific agency actions are lawful—including the Clean Air Act holding of Chevron itself—are still subject to statutory stare decisis despite our change in interpretive methodology.””

I noticed that when reading it. The court doesn't want to be flooded with cases that are the result of having overthrown Chevron.

One thing I'd like to see the court do, is to give a lot more deference to liberty than it does. Perhaps getting rid of Chevron is a part of that. It still seems to me that the scales are weighted to favor the feral government over citizens.