Marxism? humm. ok then, have it your way: we obviously disagree because we have a different definition and characterization of ‘religion’ and its practice.
frankly, imho, that’s basically because you have your own set of facts for argument sake. just look at the first Covenant Jews under the Law of God given by Moses, or the Muslims, or the Mormons, or the Pagan Greeks, or the Aztecs or the Molech worshiping Phillistines, or even Marxism for instance. much of that religious practice would and should be illegal under the Constitution and is in fact under ‘due process.’
again, taking your own set of facts is always a good way to win your argument no matter what.
(btw, that’s always the technique of a libertarian or liberal.)
at least we can agree that there is no good reason for the gov’t to ban the standard practice of the Christian religion which is to ‘Love God, and then like unto it, love your neighbor as yourself.’ may God bless you and yours.