Assertion of this is pushing a part their narrative, which the rational people left in this world reject.
And they get "triggered" basically to the extent there is an element in society which caters to them doing so.
Maybe we should also avoid the term "people" to cater to the growing number of people identifying as animals. If a woman who identifies as a dog or takes drugs to become doglike says she got pregnant because she thought as a dog she wouldn't get pregnant by a human man, should we believe and "reach out to her?" Perhaps we can't even say "animals" as some people might identify as inanimate objects.
No, you don't adopt these people's words or narratives.
I hope this website bans the website you posted this from. It is obviously disingenuous and posting it here is merely a pretext to post that garbage here—from someone who has demonstrated support of these gender-untruthful terms in other contexts.
I respectfully, and highly recommend the cited website be disallowed on this honorable website.
“And they get “triggered” basically to the extent there is an element in society which caters to them doing so. “
They get “triggered” because their parents never told them one word “NO”.
Come on you know this, don’t act like you don’t.
Society is just sitting back watching the show. It’s the employers I feel most sorry for. When some nut leaves work because he/she was misgendered and is now making a tic tok crying like a baby over it, telling the whole world.
How is the economy going to keep going with this crap?
Then they get pregnant and have abortions? Please. I’m trying my best to keep up this fight.