Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: delta7

I do not that there were any “arms” on the Lusitania. There were a number of Canadian Army Officers, out of uniform, who boarded in New York, which was a violation of U.S. neutrality, and which the U.S. winked at, and did not take notice of. There was also a small cargo of “gun cotton” which would probably be used to manufacture artillery propellant in England, and which could be classed as a munition. American passengers would have been unaware of these violations of neutrality. As was the submarine that sank the Lusitania without warning.

But U.S. passengers could not have been unaware of the advertisements paid for by the German embassy in the shipping pages of New York newspapers warning that the German government could not insure the safety of the Lusitania specifically. Anyone looking for sailing information of the Lusitania in New York newspapers, would have seen those advertisements.


23 posted on 06/25/2024 10:16:46 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (לעזאזל עם חמאס)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Lonesome in Massachussets

The Lusitania carried 4000 cases of machine gun ammo, and a large cargo of 15 pounder shells and other military cargo. It’s been proven by examinations at the wreck, complete with samples and photos.


25 posted on 06/25/2024 10:21:17 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson