Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

James Webb Space Telescope Captures Images of Rare Phenomenon Long Anticipated By Astronomers
The Debrief ^ | June 24, 2024 | Micah Hanks

Posted on 06/24/2024 11:46:04 AM PDT by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 06/24/2024 11:46:04 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber; SunkenCiv; mowowie; SuperLuminal; Cottonbay

Webb Ping!........................


2 posted on 06/24/2024 11:46:32 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Excellent work...


3 posted on 06/24/2024 12:00:23 PM PDT by SuperLuminal ( Where is Samuel Adams when we so desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

That’s all fine but when will we see pictures of the exoplanets showing evidence of life that we were promised would more than justify the massive cost and schedule overruns?


4 posted on 06/24/2024 1:17:25 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fso301
That’s all fine but when will we see pictures of the exoplanets showing evidence of life that we were promised

Not sure who promised you evidence of life, but ya might want to give it some more time. The universe is really a big place.

5 posted on 06/24/2024 1:35:51 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fso301
..."when will we see pictures of the exoplanets showing evidence of life..."

The next generation of space telescopes will be several orders of magnitude more powerful than the JWST, MAYBE...just MAYBE they will be able to image exoplanets with enough resolution to identify some surface features...I'm 63 and I doubt that will be during my lifetime, I'll bet if you're in your 30's right now, you'll live long enough to see some really exciting things captured by space telescopes.
6 posted on 06/24/2024 1:44:00 PM PDT by The Louiswu (Pray for Peace in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Louiswu; Red Badger
Scientists have been promising the imminent detection of extraterrestrial life since at least the Martian canals hoax.

In NASA's own words from a 2016 crawl stored by the Wayback machine:

"Data from JWST will be used to study the formation and evolution of habitable worlds, and will be invaluable in understanding processes that have shaped habitability in our own Solar System. JWST is capable of making detailed observations that might allow astrobiologists to identify signatures of life on Earth-like planets beyond our Solar System."

https://web.archive.org/web/20160703200716/https://astrobiology.nasa.gov/missions/jwst/

7 posted on 06/24/2024 2:29:37 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
Not sure who promised you evidence of life

The media and their scientific sources, scientific publications, the SETI cult, etc.

8 posted on 06/24/2024 2:31:57 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fso301

No, I don’t think scientist or the people that developed and operate JWST promised you that evidence. It has been discussed, but never promised.

Btw, on another note, I won’t be surprised if life in some form is discovered to exist outside earth within the next 10 years. We’ll see.


9 posted on 06/24/2024 2:55:47 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
Btw, on another note, I won’t be surprised if life in some form is discovered to exist outside earth within the next 10 years. We’ll see.

Perhaps but what fundamentally gives you that confidence?

10 posted on 06/24/2024 4:56:46 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: fso301

The shear numbers, which makes for unlimited possibilities.


11 posted on 06/24/2024 4:58:18 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
The shear numbers, which makes for unlimited possibilities.

But those numbers reduce profoundly when one starts considering things like the type star earth has and how uncommon stars like ours are believed to be in the universe.

Finding a star like our sun is not enough because it has to be within the habitable zone of a galaxy. This criteria then wipes out a vast swath of stars in each galaxy.

It doesn't appear that any of the known exoplanets exist in solar systems resembling our own and the composition of our solar system with gas giants in the outer belts trapping interstellar debris is important for life on earth. This then brings up the possibility that our type solar system is itself uncommon which further reduces the probabilities.

On and on the reducing factors go.

There are many, many more reducing factors which Carl Sagan had to know of when he spewed his billions and billions of galaxies containing billions and billions of stars. reasoning for the probability of life out there.

12 posted on 06/24/2024 5:39:32 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fso301

“””Finding a star like our sun is not enough”””

We might not have to find anything. There’s a good chance it may find us. 🙂


13 posted on 06/24/2024 6:16:46 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Actual imagery.


14 posted on 06/24/2024 6:41:49 PM PDT by Delta 21 (If anyone is treasonous, it is those who call me such.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
There’s a good chance it may find us.

The staple of SciFi is that extraterrestrials are more advanced than earthlings. Guess it doesn't make for good books, tv and movies if we Earthlings are the most advanced in the universe, or even the only one.

15 posted on 06/24/2024 6:55:59 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: fso301
The staple of SciFi is that extraterrestrials are more advanced than earthlings. Guess it doesn't make for good books, tv and movies if we Earthlings are the most advanced in the universe, or even the only one.

Humans are so arrogant. I don't consider humans advanced at all. We can't even put a human on our closest planet which in astronomical terms is literally sitting on our lap. We can't even cure common diseases which have existed thousands of years. We're talking about a species that routinely murders each other by the thousands.

Advanced? C'mon.

16 posted on 06/25/2024 11:25:03 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
I don't consider humans advanced at all.

Ok but as compared with what/who?

17 posted on 06/25/2024 11:44:43 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fso301
It doesn't appear that any of the known exoplanets exist in solar systems resembling our own

There are multiple *trillions* of planets in the universe...Man has not scratched the surface in it's search because we're not capable. Man is primitive. Yet we're declaring life probably doesn't exist because we've look at a few hundred systems? C'mon.

18 posted on 06/25/2024 11:52:42 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fso301

Don’t need to compare. Do you think a species that routinely murders each other, can’t cure common diseases that have been with us thousands of years, and can’t even put a person on our closest planet are advanced? Really?


19 posted on 06/25/2024 11:56:23 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
There are multiple *trillions* of planets in the universe...Man has not scratched the surface in it's search because we're not capable.

That's theory but reasonable. Time and better instrumentation will reveal more exoplanets. I share your faith in that.

Never-the-less, citing absolute numbers is very misleading.

There is a long list of factors which dramatically reduce the number of exoplanets that might be out there capable of supporting life as we know it. Then there is another long list of unknowns concerning how life as we know it might have first begun in a sterile environment.

It should tell you something that no scientist popular with the media will address those reducing factors. This is no different from no scientist popular with the media coming out and saying my natural gas appliances, gas lawn tools and gas automobile are not causing global warming.

Man is primitive.

As compared with who/what?

Yet we're declaring life probably doesn't exist because we've look at a few hundred systems? C'mon.

No, just that life as we know it is sufficiently unlikely and poorly understood that odds are against us finding it anytime soon... if ever.

20 posted on 06/25/2024 12:20:31 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson