Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kazan

“”””I’m old enough to remember when our leaders feared nuclear war and tried to avoid any potential for one.””””

I also remember when we did that by bristling with nuclear weapons and maintaining over 3 million Americans in the military and conducting massive Reforgers, and fighting Russians and Chinese in Korea and Vietnam.

A weak NATO invites trouble, it doesn’t avoid it, NATO is right to be looking at military preparedness and spending more.

Jimmy Carter put us in a situation where we were anticipating WWIII in 1984, Reagan cut loose and closed that window with a lot of military energy and spending.


48 posted on 06/18/2024 8:28:37 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12
NATO's purpose was as defensive organization, one combating the dangers of communism, specifically the Soviet Union.

Now, it's business, one that thrives off aggression and bullying. And, that is what dangerous.

Russia absolutely did not have to be our enemy. Our actions and NATOs in Ukraine made them our enemy. And, that in turn, pushed Russia into an alliance with China, both militarily and economically.

The dollar and petrodollar are now endangered as the world's currency. If we keep pushing, we're looking at potential with Russia and China, which we'd lose.

58 posted on 06/18/2024 11:11:31 PM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson