Shybos be shybos
Reese is totally GHETTO
ANGEL??? Don;t think so.
Less to do with race and more to do with jealousy and the fact that Reece is a sloppy player with limited skill sets. She had five personal fouls in the game. The headshot to Clark was flagrant, but not necessarily intentional. Follow her eyes and she’s watching the ball all the way.
As for the racial aspect, Indiana probably has the whitest team in the WNBA. Of the five starters yesterday two are white, and of the eight players who saw play-time, four are white. Two of the four white players were not fouled at all, one was fouled once, and Clark was fouled six times. The four black players were fouled a total of seven times.
Clark was obviously targeted, but less for race and more out of jealously of her stardom and endorsement contracts, which Reese will never get because no mainstream corporate sponsor wants a thug with a low commend of the English language as a spokesperson.
I saw the hit from two angles in slow motion. It was flagrant all right. There was a wind-up, hit and follow-through - clearly intentional.
Angel Reese is a jealous, immature, racist thug.
Hard foul, yes, “flagrant 1” call - probably appropriate, but, this stuff happens all the time: Reese took a swipe at the ball, probably trying for a spectacular block, and missed, with the follow through whacking Clark in the head.
The article title is a flat out lie: THREE of Clark’s teammates, two of them black, ran over to her immediately.
That all said, if Reese knew what sportsmanship was, SHE would have gone over to Clark and helped Clark up. Do that, and I don’t even think Reese should have / would have received a “flagrant 1”.
Angel is mad because the eye lash endorsement doesn’t bring the money Nike is giving Clark.