Q&A is on.
To be sure, you have roused an experienced cyber veteran.
[F] disagrees with you,
having read everything [you] posted
on this for year(s) AND the chans discourse,
viewing source documents,
understanding every.single technical angle
beyond most cyber experience(s);
along with the personell motives
behind this supposed 'disclosure'
fraught with difficulties.
It does not scan.
[F] then, fully and confidently on record:
disagrees with your assesment(s)
on 'the last Q are proven fake'.
We have it all.
Future proves past.
You have so much more than you know.
Biggest intel drop in our known history.
Q
Q stands.
Q doesn't require 'humane' literary infighting
or curmudgeonly interpretation(s)'
where [some] tarry.
For some, there is a plateau, and
process improvement(s) are not possible.
Our focus and our posts continue
to improve thanks to Q-inspirational pointers; (not you).
Presently we are externally focused on poisoned
actors and systems across the universe and their ops.
These people are sick.
We are not bored or discouraged by stumbling
revisionists pulling at our coattails.,
but are encouraged by what the
future holds; NCSWIC.
Let each make their own discoveries
as they can handle, with both eyes forward.
Let us improve our skill sets.
Much work to be done.
The enemy does not take Sunday off.
May God bless FReeQs and all white hats in their finite time.
F
Q&A is off.
