>>>>Wow, I asked a simple question, “This is you, isn’t it?”, and you’ve gone round the bend, haven’t you?
So here’s the thing. You have this picture of “yourself” on you FR homepage. I ran it on Pim Eyes facial recognition and out popped the match of AnkeS who coincidentally has your face and says she’s a Freeper.
I asked if that was you and you lost it.
You could have easily said, “Nope, that’s not me.”
Now you’ve convinced me that I had it right.
Anyone reading this can easily test how I found the AnkeS profile.
So. Since AnkeS isn’t you then why are you using her picture and passing that off as your own?<<<<
_______________________________________
You screeching, self-absorbed UKE witch. You’re the scum of the earth, meggie.
Someone disagrees with you, so you investigate them?
Snooping into people’s personal lives to find info to use against them is a tactic used by Democrats. You should give Merrick Garland a call. I’m sure he’d hire you.
You’re a busy person, meggie. You’ve got pigs and chickens to feed, elk, deer and bears to kill, gut, skin and make soap out of, new fried baloney recipes to create...How do you find the time to investigate pro-America FReepers?
You tell us you’re a Christian, that you read Scripture and attend a lay-led fellowship, yet you’re the most evil, hate filled person on FR.
You’re not fooling us meggie. You’re fooling yourself.
Now run to the mods, you flaming hypocrite.
“Someone disagrees with you, so you investigate them?”
No, someone attacked me with repeated trolling posts, profanities, and relentless attacks on my family, it even made some vague threat about CPS. ANKE69 definitely got my attention.
“Snooping into people’s personal lives to find info to use against them is a tactic used by Democrats.”
Are you and ANKE69 Democrats? Because both of you have done it to me. Relentlessly. I guess that makes you two Democrats, doesn’t it? And just like Democrats you two clowns whine when your own tactics are used against you.
Hypocrites.
In any case, ANKE69 adamantly denied having tattoos and it adamantly denied any tie to the AnkeS profile over here https://usa.life/AnkeS
Just to repeat the methodology here ANKE69 PUBLICLY posted a picture on her FR profile and I ran that on Pim Eyes which scanned other PUBLIC sites and it came back with a match in the form of a four year old profile.
That match just so happens to belong to someone named Anke, who is a Freeper, and who clearly has tattoos. Not a coincidence. Not at all. The pictures are of the same person. Period.
ANKE69 acts like it doesn’t know about the tattoos.
See, this would not be an issue at all without the denials because the AnkeS profile is rather harmless on its own.
It’s ANKE69’s denials that have put the proverbial blood in the water.
Because ANKE69 is using images from someone else and ANKE69 didn’t know that the Anke whose images have been appropriated has tattoos. Ooopsie!!!
And it’s now too late to try to walk back that denial.
To summarize my reply to your indignant post I would not be looking at you people so intently if you were not first looking at me.
Here is wisdom:
“...if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”
- Friedrich Nietzsche