Posted on 06/10/2024 9:00:46 AM PDT by Red Badger
Negative gravity is the answer to the ages-old question of...
is there anti-gravity.
Anti-gravity will offer a lot of solutions to space travel, and lighter than air airplanes. With anti-gravity, we would not need fuels and we could just bounce from one part of the planet to any other with no worries about landing and getting hurt.
I just need funding to conduct the final research to get this theory confirmed.
BTW, I have another theory about what ‘gravity’ is and what causes it. If anybody wants to know it, just comment below.
‘Space’ is absence of ‘Matter’.
‘Matter’ is absence of ‘Space’......
If the entire universe consisted of just two hydrogen atoms, a billion light years apart, they would eventually come together.
Gravity depresses the fabric of ‘Space-Time’ so that they eventually collide..................
Sort of like the "Far Side" cartoon where there is a large plain with one tree, and the dinosaur runs into it?
Much science is like that these days for better, and now more often, for worse.
That’s funny….
“ Images of broken light which dance before me like a million eyes,
They call me on and on across the universe,
Thoughts meander like a restless wind
Inside a letter box they
Tumble blindly as they make their way
Across the universe”
People of color women and marginalized communities hardest hit.
If our theories about the Big Bang and Inflation are mostly correct, then it makes sense that space wasn't necessarily uniform to begin with. This might also explain the graininess of the background radiation and the discovery by the Webb telescope of galaxies that appear more well formed than expected in the early universe.
Realistically they don’t know.
Photons can’t have mass, theoretically
but gravity can move them.
What causes gravity?
they don’t know, so they give BS
explanations.
We don’t know a lot of stuff.
What I find a little disturbing
is the reluctance to admit ignorance.
i guess i agree (which, if rearranged and multiplied through = “agree”)
Well done!
appreciate the inspiration!
Photons can’t have mass, theoretically
___________________________
Photons do have mass, theoretically!
Photon energy E = hf = mc2
So m = hf/c2
That’s not too much mass, but something.
Of course, when photon stops oscillating, f=0
and m = 0
“I know that he explains how gravity works—that every bit of matter attracts every other bit of matter. But did he ever explain why?”
Jimi Hendrix explained it best -
Like attracts like, creating resonance until someone messes with the amplitude and it all gets blown up in a big bang, man.
If ‘Negative Mass’ exists, then there should be a corresponding ‘bump’ in the Space-Time Fabric instead of a ‘well’..............
“Photons can’t have mass, theoretically”
What I find a little disturbing
is the reluctance to admit ignorance.
Beatles.....................
If the Universe is like a ‘bubble’, as some theorize, then it is globular in effect even if not perfect.
That accepted, the the farthest you could possibly ‘see’ would be your own back door...................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.