True. But that’s just revolutionary courts. AFAIK, only grand jury testimony is secret. This is an active criminal case and they are hiding what was seized in a warrant secret from the defendant.
I know you were merely commenting that courts are supporting this lawlessness. But this is going to have to have a serious rollback.
Anyway, Jack smiths days are numbered. He was illegally appointed and is likely to be removed. The beady eyed Dutch weasel.
A rollback for these overreaching jurists is not enough. It should become standard HoR practice to impeach judges who affirm novel applications of law which are subsequently overturned. Once a dozen or so are impeached AND removed, the rest should come to realize it it best to stay within the letter of the law.