“He spent ten years talking about it and his conspiracies about it and there wasn’t anything the parents could do to stop him, because he stayed within the limits of the law.
It was only when he formally accused them of willingly to slaughter their children for the purposes of getting gun control did he leave himself open to a lawsuit.”
You are simply flat out lying. The shooting was in 2012, and within weeks it was no longer a topic, except he said that after exploring his doubts, he believed it was real and not a false flag.
And never, not even once, did he even HINT that parents had their kids killed. NOT ONCE. His only stated doubt was whether or not anyone was killed and whether or not the people on TV were crisis actors.
You cannot provide a single film clip proving what you claim. If a clip of him saying those things existed it would be plastered everywhere and constantly on the news when the story came up.
You are regurgitating dishonest claims and the narrative of the progressive lawfare crowd. This is about the same as claiming Trump said illegal aliens are all rapists, he banned moslems coming to America, and he had an affair with Stormy Daniels.
SOunds like you’d believe anything.
I’m not lying. I am explaining what I understand. I can be wrong, but lying implies intent to deceive.
I’m not being dishonest, but some here believe that free speech extends to the ability to create material harm.