Posted on 06/04/2024 6:53:39 PM PDT by DoodleBob
Want to help “science”?
Start by sticking to the scientific method, and not allowing socialism or politics from influencing with their agenda such as with climate change advocates, or insisting on telling people that women can be men and vice versa.
How about we try to advocate Critical Thinking, or thinking for yourself, and not Critical Theory, which is nothing but marxist indoctrination .
Yeah, it's called Fake Journals and Politically-Motivated Research, and Agenda-Driven Funding.
Yep.. science has turned into whatever the government tells them to say or funds them to say especially in the medical and environmental fields.
From this morning and the UK's Daily Mail...
An unexpected side-effect of WFH culture? Sperm are now less active
Working from home. Uh huh. Doesn't look like many of the people commenting are buying it. And for good reason. From 2022...
Especially loved this bit at the end...
...While on first look, these results may seem concerning, from a clinical perspective they confirm previous reports regarding vaccines' overall safety and reliability despite minor short‐term side effects. Since misinformation about health‐related subjects represents a public health threat, 23 our findings should support vaccinations programs. Further studies concentrating on different vaccines and populations (ex. subfertile patients) are urgently required.
Bold is mine.
So is posting this considered harrassment?
Someone with an actually inquiring mind wants to know.
The Swine Flu vaxx was pulled in ‘77 after causing fewer than three dozen reported deaths and around 500 reported injuries.
Question for Big Pharma and Big Med: Why is human life worth so much less to you lot now?
Reproductive toxicity perspectives of nanoparticles: an update
...Introduction: The rapid development of nanotechnologies with their widespread prosperities has advanced concerns regarding potential health hazards of the Nanoparticles. Results: Nanoparticles are currently present in several consumer products, including medications, food, textiles, sports equipment, and electrical components. Despite the advantages of Nanoparticles, their potential toxicity has negative impact on human health, particularly on reproductive health...
Bold is mine.
The author doesn't use the word in the abstract, but guess what else can contain nanoparticles...
Vaccines...
Researching gun control.?? We need someone to research gun control??? Sheesh.. If that's what they're researching you can bet it ain't science that's on their minds..
Showing up at the front door with a camera—isn’t that what “60 Minutes” did for decades?
Yeah, I think your on to something there...
It’s interesting that they don’t mention the harassment of scientists Dr. Kulldorff, Dr. Bhattacharya and Dr. Gupta
*********************************
Practically the entire Stanford faculty lounge was after Bhattacharya and Atlas to have them cancelled. Kulldorff was let go from the CDC Covid-19 Vaccine Safety group and later from Harvard. Here is an op-ed he wrote earlier this year.
https://www.city-journal.org/article/harvard-tramples-the-truth
Ditto
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.