At this point we have dozens or even hundreds of high ranking and reliable professionals saying that they have witnessed technology that defies the known laws of physics.
It’s either manmade, extraterrestrial or supernatural.
I think the manmade explanation is the most reasonable.
At that point you would need to back into how the manmade explanation would have unfolded. I think the narrative I laid out is the most reasonable one.
This is what I find ridiculous:
“How could you get the scientists and researchers to continue developing the tech while convincing them that it could never be disclosed to the public?....
You could tell them it is “alien technology” and to disclose the existence of aliens would cause “mass hysteria” and “societal breakdown”.”
Also, thousands upon thousands of government employees have been paid to say stupid things publicly.
Then add in all those who would say such things because it simply fits their nature, whether of stupidity or excuse-offering...