So, as you've already shared, I think there will be a strong demand for the "AI Whisperers", as you called them. My addendum to the prediction might be the creation of an AI Fact Checker. This would be a paid researcher/editor who verifies and tests the content output. For example, AI compiled decent open source info on my father's historic legal achievements, but with major inaccuracies that were spotted by me only because I was his son. This scares me as history can be further rewritten (or erased) and new generations would never know any better. (Of course, a coded fix to this might be the best solution through producing a data output option of notated references.)
I’ve discovered, in AI Whispering, that context is everything. The more context you give it, the better the results. I’ve also discovered a Magic Word when getting AI to deliver coding results. It stops at a point. Simply say “Continue” and it will deliver more of the code. Rinse and repeat.
Elon Musk (says, at least that he) is working to make a maximally curious, maximally truth-seeking, AI.The legal principle is that official facts are determined by juries. So ultimately a truth-seeking AI must become a prosecutor/plaintiff lawyer and, equally, a defense lawyer.
Stipulating that not every thing that every Republican says is going to be true, Adam Schiff Democrats have no analog in the Republican Party. Unless you count rogues like Liz Cheney or (2012 Republican nominee for POTUS!) Mitt Romney, whom mainstream Republicans repudiate. The reason is of course the fact that the business interest of any journalist favors excitement/fear inducing stories, and such stories need not actually be true.
It occurs to me that Jordan Peterson says a couple of germane things. One is that it is all very well to get all absorbed by the issue of intelligence - but there is such a thing as wisdom - which he says is not only different from, but actually uncorrelated with, IQ. But nobody is explicitly talking about “artificial wisdom.”
Another is that Peterson asserts that
This is somewhat counterintuitive. But since conscientiousness and openness are uncorrelated, I suppose someone like Elon Musk can be very high in both dimensions of personality.
- conscientiousness is highly correlated with conservatism, whereas
- openness/creativity is very highly correlated with opposition to conservatism.
The other three dimensions of personality, BTW, are extroversion, agreeableness, and anxiousness. Seems odd that the “five dimensions of personality,” are all uncorrelated with IQ and with each other, and yet Peterson never suggests how wisdom fits with the “five” personality traits. Does it stand alone, like IQ?
” For example, AI compiled decent open source info on my father’s historic legal achievements, but with major inaccuracies that were spotted by me only because I was his son. This scares me as history can be further rewritten (or erased) and new generations would never know any better.”
And therein lies a major problem...ie GIGO?