Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke

Duggie, my old friend. Are you still using your mantra of “safe and effective” , my dear intellectual enabler?

That is an interesting take you have as to why the’76 vax was stopped. While you are correct that the swine flu failed to manifest, that is not why it was stopped. The reported deaths, as well as the cases of guillian-barre were omnipresent in the press. Articles daily and the population was concerned and the Ford administration could not pull it fast enough. I lived through that, first hand, and You are clearly just wrong.

“Do you read any peer reviewed reports/studies that do not support the anti-vaxxer narrative?”

Peer Reviewed? That USED to be the gold standard until your side took control of the process and censored and defunded any research that did not support endless ineffective mutatedRNA vaxes. Peer review is compromised and is meaningless now. The real question, with you as an intellectual enabler, is do you read any reviews and studies that do not support the endless ineffectual vaccination position that you love? You are so wonderfully dismissive of any researcher that does not support your sides untruths.


20 posted on 05/10/2024 9:52:43 AM PDT by cyberstoic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: cyberstoic

cyberstoic wrote: “That is an interesting take you have as to why the’76 vax was stopped. While you are correct that the swine flu failed to manifest, that is not why it was stopped. “

“Meanwhile, not only had a pandemic yet to appear, but no swine flu cases outside of the Fort Dix cluster had even been reported. Even if there was no connection between the vaccine and Guillain-Barré syndrome, the risk was no longer acceptable. After the vaccination of 45 million Americans—nearly a quarter of the country’s population—the government halted the program on December 16.”

https://www.history.com/news/swine-flu-rush-vaccine-election-year-1976

cyberstoic wrote: “Peer Reviewed? That USED to be the gold standard until your side took control of the process and censored and defunded any research that did not support endless ineffective mutatedRNA vaxes.”

So you’re claiming that a conspiracy is the reason no peer reviewed studies support the anti-vaxxer narrative? It’s far more likely that is a false narrative.


21 posted on 05/10/2024 11:30:25 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson