[woodpusher]

In reality, dingbats on the internet are probably more knowledgeable and more rational than the dingbats on the benches.

So say the dingbats on the internet. Fortunately, the courts ignore their mutterings.

First Nat. Bank and Trust Co. of Vinita v. Kissee, 1993 OK 96, 859 P.2d 502, paragraph 40, footnotes omitted:

“Simply put, subjective good faith no longer provides the safe harbor it once did.” “There is no room for a pure heart, empty head defense under Rule 11.”

[DiogenesLamp]

So say the dingbats on the internet. Fortunately, the courts ignore their mutterings.

What is "fortunate" about that sh*thead's presidency? What good thing did he do for this nation? How was the public interest served?

Sounds like the dingbats win one over the arrogant idiot courts.