Flame away, mods pull if to controversial.
Some libertarians are against masks, forced jabs, lockdowns, etc. because they see it as a paternalistic imposition and violation of the NAP.
Other libertarians believe that unjabbed people walking around are a violation of the NAP since they could be infectious.
If people had remained rational they would have all agreed that if the jabs worked then there was no need to require everyone to get jabs, and if they didn't work then nobody should have got jabbed.
Libertarians used to be against helmet laws even though motorcyclists without helmets who crashed could cost the health care system (and thus insurance companies) more money . Applying this same logic, the only downside of allowing others to choose not to get jabbed is that it will cost the health care system more money and potentially fill up more hospital beds.