To: alloysteel
Does anyone else wonder if perhaps OJ WAS innocent and the gloves not fitting and the Detective hx of racist language use was important to the trial?
If he was innocent, what was the motivation for railroading and innocent man, celebrity no less, into a murder conviction?
To: desertsolitaire
No wondering here, especially since Ron and Nicole’s blood was found inside O.J.’s Bronco. Not buying that LAPD planted it.
To: desertsolitaire
Maybe the gloves didn’t fit because they were previously soaked in a liquid, namely blood, and once dried they shrank. A verdict shouldn’t have rested on that thin thread of “evidence” but this is our justice system and it has issued its verdict nonetheless.
As with all of us we have to stand before GOD and account for our time here on earth, and O.J. has received his just reward, good or bad. Let’s hope O.J. made peace with GOD before he went
17 posted on
04/11/2024 11:34:14 AM PDT by
dznutz
To: desertsolitaire
The dramatic glove play-acting by Simpson, who had acted in several movies, was a misstep by the prosecution—they put up no counter argument to that pantomime. Leather shrinks when wet or dampened, such as by blood, sweat, or dampness on the ground where it was found, which would account for the gloves not "fitting."
Another credible theory is that his older son, a chef with daily access to knives, did the actual crime and O.J. knew or possibly witnessed it and was protecting him.
We may never know. But something stunk on ice about that trial. Robert Kardashian took what he knew to his grave.
24 posted on
04/11/2024 4:59:51 PM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(Either ‘the Deep State destroys America, or we destroy the Deep State.’ --Donald Trump)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson