imho there should be an amendment to the law to clarify the meaning of natural born citizen.
“there should be an amendment to the law to clarify the meaning of natural born citizen.”
This is the only way that it will ever be defined and not interpreted. The courts all of then including by lack of action the Supreme Court have left the current interpretation to be if you are born on American soil you are a natural born citizen. Argue till blue in the face won’t change the fact that right now for all legal standing this is what the courts plural have said is the law of the land. Don’t like , scream to the hills about doesn’t matter it is standing policy and will not change until either the Supreme Court over turns USA v Wong and a slew of other rulings or a amendment is passed over their heads. That’s just how it is. I look forward to the 400+ replies these threads always get with all the huff and puff and mental masturbation. Nothing will change until one of the above two things happens. The likely hood of the USSC ruling that the big I was retrospectively ineligible is like lottery odds as in virtually zero. So the amendment route is the only way and also not very likely since the blue states don’t want one citizen parent which would also stop their precious anchor babies in the same amendment one cannot be done without the other. So the blue states will never slammed out the 14th anchor baby clause.