Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LS

The same way in that a huge ship struck a supporting foundational pier. But different in that the cause was one heck of a storm and spontaneous wind gusts that blew that ship (in Tampa Bay) off course. The ship had emptied its cargo in Tampa and was off somewhere in the Gulf, riding high in the water and with a lot of sail area. But it had power. Another similarity was the bridge decking ending up draped over the bow. I believe the death toll in Tampa was 31-33 people, the majority of which were on a Greyhound bus that took the big dive.


6 posted on 03/29/2024 7:34:13 PM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Wally_Kalbacken

The catastrophic collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore was the result of its design that had limited redundancies and is similar to other past bridge collapses. Those catastrophic failures were caused by just one weak element (Tampa, Florida and Minneapolis are examples). Built in 1977, as a continuous through truss bridge, the Francis Scott Key Bridge lacked the redundancies found in more modern designs. The cantilever truss is a better design with protective “barriers” that protect the pier (as in the rebuilt Sunshine Skyway Bridge in Tampa).


9 posted on 03/29/2024 11:04:07 PM PDT by jonrick46 (Leftniks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

Yes, but I think this guy does a fantastic job of explaining what happened here.


11 posted on 03/30/2024 8:32:05 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson