Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NorthMountain

It’s still birth control.

And as such should be condemned as other forms are.

If preventing the conception is the crime, is murder, then it matters little how it is done.

Catholicism condemns Onan for his actions in avoiding impregnating his sister-in-law to raised up children to carry on his brother’s name. NFP is no different.

The goal of NFP is to enjoy sex without the *risk* of pregnancy, something die hard Catholics condemn as immoral and the cause of the collapse of western civilization.

Clearly many Catholics think that enjoying sex for the sake of it is wrong.

Here’s a clue. GOD created it and made it pleasurable. Based on the result of the Fall, and Eve’s greatly increased conception, it’s no stretch to conclude that God intended married couples to enjoy that kind of intimacy just because.


24 posted on 03/26/2024 8:21:11 AM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
It’s still birth control.

Use of bad terminology renders intelligent discussion impossible.

Artificial contraception is everything I said it is, and is wrong because of that.

Monitored fertility is everything I said it is, and is normal and natural because of it.

That which is condemned is artificial contraception because it rejects God's plan rather than working with it.

But you already knew that.

26 posted on 03/26/2024 8:25:06 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson