You obviously never examined the data or read more than Pfizer's analysis. Pfizer wanted to hide its trial data for 75 YEARS for a reason. The truth isn't pretty.You are running and hiding. I point out devastating information which you ignore and as if speaking to yourself, engage in talking point 'discussions'.
For anyone reading this who wants to know the truth about the 'vaccines', the following article by CHristian Eliot is a good starting point.
"If that’s not alarming enough, here are other gaps in the data — in other words, there is no data to suggest safety or efficacy regarding:
- Anyone younger than age 18 or older than age 55.
- Pregnant or lactating mothers.
- Autoimmune conditions.
- Immunocompromised individuals.
- No data on transmission of COVID.
- No data on preventing mortality from COVID.
- No data on duration of protection from COVID.
In case you think I’m making this up, or want to see the actual documents sent to the FDA by Pfizer and Moderna for their Emergency Use Authorization, you can check out this, or this respectively. The data gaps can be found starting with page 46 and 48 respectively."
18 Reasons I Won’t Be Getting a COVID Vaccine
ransomnote: without data, the pharmas and their shills have been pushing the 'safe and effective' lies from day 1. I encourage everyone to read the article in full as it is in some places, just jaw dropping.
You are correct. I am shifting the narrative. The time was not taken on the point of the discussion. I have been distracted other developments on the COVID scene. The study by Queensland Health in Australia which challenges the concept of “long COVID” has my interest. I’m not certain if it is the last word on it. And I heard on my local station that Ivermectin was found to be effective. So far, the latest information is insufficient.