Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux
The alternative to saying man is born in sin is to assert that he is naturally good. But if we are all naturally good, when then do we sin? The necessary answe4r of those who assert natural goodness is that sin is imputed into everyone from some external source.

At this point inevitably the scapegoating begins. Everyone has something they dislike, and the "naturally good" folks invariably pick out some institution or group of people that they demonize as this "source of all evil." Dawkins blames the Christians, others have blamed the Jews, or blacks, or capitalists, etc. From here it is a short walk to the natural conclusion: Utopia could be ours, if we just stamp out the Source of All Evil that is corrupting society!

And so a nice-sounding belief that everyone is naturally good becomes, by ruthless logic, a driver of genocide against the scapegoated group. You can see this again and again through history. Such a nice-sounding idea. Such hellish consequences. All because they won't acknowledge that sin begins in their own heart.

14 posted on 03/14/2024 3:05:24 PM PDT by EnderWiggin1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: EnderWiggin1970

Should read “why then do we sin?” in the 2nd sentence, sorry.


15 posted on 03/14/2024 3:06:08 PM PDT by EnderWiggin1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: EnderWiggin1970

Dawkins, or any atheist, doesn’t claim everyone is born ‘good’.

It may be the conclusion one who believes everyone is born ‘sinful’ might come to though.


24 posted on 03/14/2024 7:21:09 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson