Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeeSharp

Its so old, its new again!

But really, the hyper-agility thing may have come and gone. The Tejas has advanced (more or less) avionics, a nice radar, look-down-shoot down capability vs cruise missiles and etc., long range missiles (MBDA ASRAAM).

And in theory anyway, if it weren’t for its interminable development time, probably cheap.


14 posted on 03/12/2024 8:57:13 AM PDT by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: buwaya

Indeed so. Being cheap means there can be many more produced. And remember, we didn’t have the best stuff in WW II, but we did have the ability to produce a h*ll of a lot of each unit. The F-35 may be a top of the line fighter, but there are few of them, and each is useless without equally expensive missiles. In addition, each has electronics which require replacement, not repair when (not if) things go microsoft on it.


15 posted on 03/12/2024 9:30:23 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson