Posted on 03/10/2024 12:56:23 AM PST by ganeemead
He isn’t capable of that. No worries.
This guy is a jack wagon. Plain and simple.
Thanks for reading the whole thing for me.
A couple of takeaways:
1) The M-1 was destroyed by the T-72 on the FIRST SHOT, from over a mile away.
2) Brian’s theory is that the Dems and Republicans are working together to NOT pass the $61B, as passing it won’t matter in the combat zone (we’re simply out of weapons available for Ukraine - that simple) - and that passing the bill, seeing it didn’t help Ukraine at all, would send China the message that the Western Woke, DEI, Globohomo, and EPA-Certified Military is a FACADE (I wonder why?).
(I added the description of our present military)
“One tank on one tank. Fifty tanks on fifty tanks is different.”
Tanks are becoming more irreverent everyday. Russia is learning how to fight against America’s technical superiority using low tech with a combination of new tech. They are producing around 35,000 drones a month now. They even invented a new drone that using a fiber optic cable that can go a couple miles and is impossible to jam.
They are also adding rudimentary AI to send drones at specific people and objects that don’t need an operator.
When I hear about the cable, I thought it was impossible. But they are making strong flexible fiber optics that are about the width of a two hairs. I image a fleet of fifty tanks trying to take on ten thousand drones?
Battlefield tactics are changing. Steel sharpens steel, we are making a weak Russian army much more capable.
Update on the conflict in Ukraine for March 10, 2024...
- US President Joe Biden claims Ukraine can “beat Putin” if given the weapons and ammunition to do so;
- The weapons and ammunition simply do not exist in the necessary quantities to do so and what is being sent to Ukraine is performing far short of expectations;
- US-made M1 Abrams destroyed by Russian T-72B3 dispelling the myth of American military superiority;
- Western arms manufacturers continue claiming interest in building facilities inside Ukraine but fail to explain how they would prevent such facilities from being destroyed by Russian missiles and drones;
- The West is failing to deliver sufficient amounts of artillery ammunition with a recent plan to secure rounds from outside the EU falling short of its 800,000 target;
- Increasing talk of more direct Western intervention in Ukraine suggests growing desperation among Western capitals;
You should write jokes for Gutfeld.
It looks and sounds like Russia "Kills its best Generals" when they don't make Putin happy.
NATO fops and Neocon wankers have engineered the biggest military debacle since the Chinese Tang dynasty, very much worse than either Dunkirk or Little Bighorn.
“ More Russian propaganda
More Russian desperation
Only 1 week to go until Vlady’s pre-rigged election ... why isn’t he talking about the War, if it’s going so great for Russia?
lol”
**********************************************************
Oh, Frenchy, it’s so funny when you tell us all about one of your waking hallucinations. Or are you just on mission to get America deeper in debt to help it catch up to your country on its descent down the ROAD TO SHIT-HOLE-DOM?
That's a crock. In the 1973 Yom Kippur War, the Israelis found the Arabs' Soviet-made T-72s couldn't hit the broad side of a barn beyond 1100 meters. The Israeli's American-made M-60s (and even American M-48s retrofitted with the M-68 105mm rifled-bore gun), on the other hand, could zap a T-72 from 3 kilometers. So of the Israelis encountered an Arab tank at a range of more than 1100 meters, they could take their own sweet time about shooting it with minimal danger fro return fire.
And one of the cardinal rules of warfare is to always engage the enemy from the maximum range of your weapons systems (especially if you have near three times the enemy's range).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.