Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/28/2024 8:36:01 AM PST by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CondoleezzaProtege

Thank you Alabama!


2 posted on 02/28/2024 8:40:19 AM PST by JayGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

It’s sort of ironic watching the Alabama legislature and governor scramble to dilute the ruling.


3 posted on 02/28/2024 8:46:07 AM PST by joesbucks (It's called love-bombing. Claiming he's saving the world. This is a cult. Just back away. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege
The Alabama Supreme Court decision is one of the morally clearest rulings of the decade.

"morally clear" is an excellent way to describe it. Our post-modern, nihilist society refuses to look at where life, and human dignity, originate.

4 posted on 02/28/2024 8:47:07 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

From a religious/moral view, a very good commentary. Well worth the read by all Christians.


5 posted on 02/28/2024 9:02:44 AM PST by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

“Unfortunately, many Christians—including those who consider themselves “pro-life”—are lacking in similar moral clarity.”

____________________________________________

Oh yeah, isn’t that the truth. We have several here who claim the GOP will lose everything over this IVF and abortion.

First, when federal legislation was even mentioned, they claimed they’re the most pro-life people on the planet but that the killing of children was a state issue. Then when the states act to protect the little boys and girls, these pro-lifers-in-name-only claim it is an issue that the government should not be involved in at all and the GOP should be neutral to get more votes.

Murder should always be illegal on any and all levels. And when one states that fact, the posers go off on tangents of the legal definitions of murder, etc. Or they’ll claim that murdering children for IVF is no different than children dying in miscarriages. Or that we’re not a theocracy, as if murder is based on religion. These people are sick and have no moral clarity.

With pro-lifers like that, who needs Satan or the Democrats?


7 posted on 02/28/2024 9:11:11 AM PST by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

“The Court noted that Article I of the state’s constitution of 2022 “acknowledges, declares, and affirms that it is the public policy of this state to ensure the protection of the rights of the unborn child in all manners and measures lawful and appropriate.”

That section, titled “Sanctity of Unborn Life,” operates in this context as a constitutionally imposed canon of construction, directing courts to construe ambiguous statutes in a way that “protect[s] . . . the rights of the unborn child” equally with the rights of born children, whenever such construction is “lawful and appropriate.””


11 posted on 02/28/2024 9:50:25 AM PST by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson