Thanks for asking the question.
This was the official NASA schematics for the on-board command module and lunar module navigation computer.
The schematics are a “Potemkin village”—a computer that looks like a computer on the outside but it is not functional.
This is not exactly state of the art technology so it hardly makes sense for NASA to hide the “secret sauce” of the 1960s computer.
That leaves us with two alternatives:
(1) The schematic is legit—the computers were fake—the missions never happened.
That is my view.
(2) The schematic is sabotaged by whistleblowers terrified to come forward but leaving the message for posterity that the missions were faked.
That is possible—because if you dig deep into the very extensive literature (that obviously is new to you) there are a lot of interesting OOPAs (out of place artifacts) in the record that could only be caused by whistleblowers.
https://www.aulis.com/rover_fenders.htm
The rovers on Apollo 15, 16, and 17 could not have been on the moon.
The absolute proof of this lies in the pictures on the very bottom of the article showing the identical oil leak from the left rear wheel.
The “whistleblowing” part would be some clever photographer in the studio choosing to take a picture showing that specific portion of the rovers.
[i]The schematics are a “Potemkin village”—a computer that looks like a computer on the outside but it is not functional.[/i]
How do you *know* that?
What is your expertise in this area. We “know” it was functional, (because it is self evident we landed on the moon 6 times). Are you smarter than the guys and gals at MIT? Maybe. But …. that’s probably not the way to bet. I know I am not.
You’re the one making the claim here, so it is up to you to prove your case, in detail.
Show your work.