Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Freedom4US

Artemis is trying to do it.

They are having many problems.

They have outsourced the crew quarters (equivalent of the command module and lunar module) to the European Space Agency and they are totally stumped. They don’t even know where to start.

The best hope (imho) is Elon Musk because he is willing to take some big risks to make it happen.

My view is he will figure it out—but there will be dead astronauts—because this stuff is really difficult.


106 posted on 02/23/2024 4:28:05 PM PST by cgbg ("Our democracy" = Their Kleptocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: cgbg

It’s interesting you suggested that link about the DSKY, I read that the other night.

Now, you offered that as proof it could not have happened. I went through it, and I must admit I did not understand it. And I also admit, that I do not understand the NASA website (or the MIT documents of the source code that explain it).

This is getting into what is called Epistemology. On the one hand, we have thiusands of people who were involved in making this software work for an intended purpose. They thought it would work. They think it worked. Armstrong quipped in a speech at the Draper lab at MIT that the DSKY itself “cost more than a small country”.

On the other hand, there is one individual who says it couldn’t possibly have worked, it didn’t have the capability to do certain things, and here’s why. Except, I don’t understand any of it. I have to take their word for it.

Do you understand the software coding involved? Have you independently confirmed his conclusions yourself? Why do you believe him, and not MIT?

I mean maybe, but that’s probably not the way to bet. Correct me if I’m wrong about your coding abilities or DSKY familiarity, but we’re left with the argument that I should believe NASA faked the moon landings, because you say this guy over there on that website is really smart.


107 posted on 02/23/2024 5:07:30 PM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: cgbg

Mea culpa, replied to meself. You won’t see that.

See where I’m going with that? What makes you qualified to judge the relative merits of software coding of orbital mechanics? It’s way out of my wheelhouse. We can choose to believe what we want, or who we want, but is there something that sticks out for you?


110 posted on 02/25/2024 10:01:14 AM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson