What are you on about? I can’t “research” what you already believe.
Is it your contention that humans cannot leave earth orbit? I already know that this indeed must be the case. What’s the show stopper?
I watched the press conference again, as much as I could stand, again, a half hour maybe. Boring. The Apollo 11 crew is a little “dry” at times, compared to the others. At least, Neil Armstrong was. I would agree he had almost no perceptible personality - at least in public. LOL. If you’ve watched as many films on NASA personalities as I have, you’d know this already. I always thought maybe Pete Conrad or Jim Young or Frank Borman should have maybe been the first crew. Or Lovell, Borman Hayes. A bit more approachable.
You can see this characteristic right from the beginning when Armstrong was picked up in the Group 2 astronauts aka “The Next Nine” in 1962. You ask Neil a question, and he would just stare, almost as if he didn’t hear you. Right at the point you feel like repeating the question, then he would start gushing out this lengthy, convoluted yet perfectly precise response, almost like a computer. He was a very private individual. Not a recluse, a private individual. None of those guys cared too much for the press or any of that nonsense.
You gave the standard explanation.
There are so many great details in that press conference.
I just gave you a link showing the computer was a fraud.
There are also several mentions of “simulation”.
Collins has a hilarious comment about “we were closer than it seemed” to Earth.
I could go on and on.
It is all there—you just have to pay attention—if you are capable of quieting your mind—tossing away the brainwashing—and focusing on what they are saying.
Listen to their discussion of the footprints, then later of the depth of the print of the lunar module.
Listen to their vague and hilarious comments about what scientists will do with the moon soil samples.
It just goes on and on—it is right there waiting for you to find it.